Accountability
 

In order for a school to make adequate yearly progress (AYP), not less than 95% of all students and of each designated subgroup of students must be assessed.  Students must meet or exceed the state objectives for all students and for each subgroup of students.

Ohio Elementary School AYP Targets for 2011-12
Grade
Reading
Math
Attendance
3
88.5%
84.2%
93.0%
4
87.3%
86.8%
93.0%
5
87.3%
79.8%
93.0%

Ohio Middle School AYP Targets for 2011-12

Grade
Reading
Math
Attendance
6
90.3%
82.1%
93.0%
7
87.4%
78.9%
93.0%
8
89.5%
79.0%
93.0%
Ohio High School AYP Targets for 2011-12
Grade
Reading
Math
Graduation
10
88.7%
84.0%
TBA

Subgroups include:

      • Economically disadvantaged students
      • Students from major racial and ethnic groups
      • Students with disabilities
      • Students with limited English proficiency
Before the beginning of each school year, every district must identify its schools failing to make Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) for two or more consecutive years.  These schools are placed into School Improvement (SI) status. 
Percent of Students Proficient or Above on OAA in READING
3rd
4th
5th
2006-07
2007-08
2008-09
2009-10
2010-11
2006-07
2007-08
2008-09
2009-10
2010-11
2006-07
2007-08
2008-09
2009-10
2010-11
Elementary Schools NOT in School Improvement Bettes Continuous Improvement
78
64
71
81
84
86
72
73
69
64
59
68
50
38
56
Betty Jane Effective
74
74
82
84
81
83
70
80
71
87
86
75
69
65
66
Firestone Park Effective
88
86
95
79
86
79
89
83
85
82
80
51
76
65
66
Forest Hill Continuous Improvement
65
58
54
58
67
85
86
68
74
70
67
57
60
57
48
Hatton Effective
83
84
77
80
79
81
85
89
85
82
79
75
70
77
77
King Excellent
95
90
91
87
95
84
90
93
85
91
97
82
95
81
82
Lawndale Continuous Improvement
76
74
65
81
69
71
73
67
68
83
82
34
68
54
54
Leggett Effective
77
67
84
87
86
80
88
94
87
94
79
55
64
50
64
McEbright Continuous Improvement
66
66
76
38
57
61
60
72
53
53
51
47
44
22
33
Miller-South  Excellent
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
99
96
95
99
96
94
92
91
91
95
NIHF-STEM Excellent
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA

86

82
Pfeiffer Academic Watch
65
60
56
57
69
84
65
80
75
63
72
68
49
55
36
Portage Path Continuous Improvement
67
54
76
73
65
86
63
63
68
75
63
64
65
42
57
Resnik

Effective

97
84
85
87
80
78
94
95
86
88
87
73
82
67
72
Rimer Academic Watch
95
66
71
71
42
96
85
68
68
73
92
71
61
65
52
Ritzman Excellent
76
72
74
73
69
76
76
80
72
73
64
61
54
80
71
Salem
Continuous Improvement
76
69
57
61
83
74
51
72
65
77
79
51
44
58
49
Smith Continuous Improvement
70
83
79
90
63
84
78
71
78
100
73
79
54
63
48
Voris Continuous Improvement
80
68
67
63
80
79
72
67
64
87
75
67
63
56
53
Windemere Excellent
86
81
84
92
85
86
91
97
78
94
88
76
75
85
75
Elementary Schools IN School Improvement Arnold Academic Watch
NA
52
70
48
55
NA
52
67
61
69
NA
39
37
26
70
Barber Academic Watch
59
54
74
74
57
66
69
80
61
68
73
64
55
65
59
Barrett Academic Watch
53
63
60
51
47
69
51
53
35
41
85
47
29
42
34
Bridges Continuous Improvement
NA
NA
NA
56
NA
NA
NA
30
36
NA
NA
NA
NA
24
73
Case Continuous Improvement
83
72
73
69
64
71
67
63
67
68
72
49
49
47
42
Crouse Academic Emergency
73
33
50
44
43
56
40
62
54
54
49
44
42
42
49
Essex Continuous Improvement
86
85
81
66
65
82
83
83
76
83
71
59
56
57
49
Findley Continuous Improvement
61
51
30
53
42
54
59
51
41
58
78
32
34
45
41
Glover Continuous Improvement
73
59
59
49
67
66
73
62
69
69
52
56
60
56
53
Harris Continuous Improvement
75
71
77
78
76
94
68
71
67
68
67
58
51
49
62
Hill Academic Watch
77
72
64
42
41
63
56
73
62
57
65
67
37
47
53
Mason

Continuous Improvement

71
59
48
57
68
65
73
66
61
64
57
53
31
34
54
Rankin Academic Watch
59
55
31
41
47
53
52
42
65
47
48
44
38
44
39
Robinson Continuous Improvement
55
54
68
49
61
48
40
57
55
38
65
30
37
33
44
Schumacher Continuous Improvement
87
55
58
65
58
56
70
68
69
67
64
40
68
38
52
Seiberling Academic Watch
59
61
64
60
59
74
66
73
56
74
69
61
62
56
57
Percent of Students Proficient or Above on OAA in MATH
3rd
4th
5th
2006-07
2007-08
2008-09
2009-10
2010-11
2006-07
2007-08
2008-09
2009-10
2010-11
2006-07
2007-08
2008-09
2009-10
2010-11
Elementary Schools NOT in School Improvement Bettes Continuous Improvement
91
67
80
69
78
83
60
70
60
64
20
34
21
27
26
Betty Jane Effective
73
66
77
79
79
74
68
75
71
77
51
25
47
55
47
Firestone Park Effective
93
83
86
75
80
74
69
83
77
75
38
41
45
56
37
Forest Hill Continuous Improvement
76
61
54
57
73
95
79
68
75
77
33
29
38
54
68
Hatton Effective
86
76
76
80
78
78
76
80
75
76
80
65
58
77
63
King Excellent
98
88
81
72
84
73
91
94
91
86
68
73
80
67
85
Lawndale Continuous Improvement
86
75
85
75
83
57
63
63
75
71
46
17
36
33
38
Leggett Effective
65
75
84
89
86
77
90
88
85
92
69
27
39
37
36
McEbright Continuous Improvement
79
68
83
34
59
75
37
66
64
53
31
35
28
16
25
Miller-South  Excellent
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
99
95
92
98
96
80
72
80
73
77
NIHF-STEM Excellent
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA

72

75
Pfeiffer Academic Watch
74
52
77
57
80
75
56
75
69
58
33
31
21
45
24
Portage Path Continuous Improvement
62
48
76
66
65
86
52
63
63
72
37
46
36
34
43
Resnik

Effective

95
95
91
89
85
59
91
90
86
84
51
40
62
43
62
Rimer Academic Watch
85
75
76
53
42
85
81
78
40
65
73
50
56
69
31
Ritzman Excellent
79
84
78
73
73
71
56
45
54
77
46
22
21
74
60
Salem
Continuous Improvement
79
53
60
52
77
60
49
62
52
69
50
29
19
50
27
Smith Continuous Improvement
84
78
74
82
74
81
65
66
60
75
51
51
39
37
33
Voris Continuous Improvement
74
62
57
55
67
60
47
64
58
65
46
29
30
53
45
Windemere Excellent
86
84
88
84
89
73
67
83
75
92
63
59
57
76
64
Elementary Schools IN School Improvement Arnold Academic Watch
NA
46
54
63
50
NA
46
69
57
55
NA
6
12
18
14
Barber Academic Watch
82
78
82
81
52
66
62
74
68
70
34
34
48
33
31
Barrett Academic Watch
59
40
60
41
44
52
27
43
35
44
38
28
22
36
29
Bridges Continuous Improvement
NA
NA
NA
51
NA
NA
NA
50
28
NA
NA
NA
NA
14
73
Case Continuous Improvement
90
71
79
66
68
71
57
52
58
58
48
44
58
30
34
Crouse Academic Emergency
81
26
68
26
28
53
48
38
39
39
43
25
15
20
20
Essex Continuous Improvement
81
70
79
56
68
79
69
70
79
67
31
57
39
28
31
Findley Continuous Improvement
68
29
32
42
43
70
47
53
47
60
48
25
20
53
31
Glover Continuous Improvement
71
55
57
65
64
60
69
51
62
62
36
35
56
43
49
Harris Continuous Improvement
81
54
62
52
72
89
70
76
48
63
35
31
32
35
56
Hill Academic Watch
77
62
68
39
46
50
46
68
42
41
33
33
34
51
35
Mason

Continuous Improvement

73
55
65
57
45
71
59
64
63
73
29
38
26
31
54
Rankin Academic Watch
51
45
46
42
74
36
43
37
38
38
26
50
35
32
32
Robinson Continuous Improvement
50
53
90
51
64
44
21
49
26
41
41
14
24
17
16
Schumacher Continuous Improvement
76
58
54
67
65
33
59
52
61
61
23
22
42
15
40
Seiberling Academic Watch
66
62
46
45
48
61
60
67
55
70
39
32
40
44
26

 

Percent of Students Proficient or Above on OAA in READING
6th
7th
8th
2006-07
2007-08
2008-09
2009-10
2010-11
2006-07
2007-08
2008-09
2009-10
2010-11
2006-07
2007-08
2008-09
2009-10
2010-11
Middle
Schools NOT in School Improvement
Miller-South Excellent
96
98
99
98
97
95
99
98
97
91
96
99
97
100
97
NIHF-STEM Excellent
NA
NA
NA
95
97
NA
NA
NA
NA
94
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
Middle
Schools IN School Improvement
Akron Opportunity Center Academic Emergency
NA
NA
NA
17
NA
NA
NA
17
30
12
NA
13
15
18
50
Bridges Continuous Improvement
NA
0
50
43
42
NA
NA
NA
19
NA
NA
NA
40
14
41
Hyre Effective
77
79
81
83
88
78
74
76
80
77
82
80
71
78
86
Innes Academic Watch
65
67
69
63
58
64
54
55
58
52
66
61
48
66
71
Jennings Continuous Improvement
52
63
62
54
58
61
58
60
56
47
70
57
51
53
66
Kent Continuous Improvement
65
64
71
71
65
58
67
56
56
66
59
56
55
63
77
Litchfield Continuous Improvement
75
70
73
82
77
74
71
62
75
81
83
82
70
71
82
Perkins Academic Watch
38
53
59
62
52
46
46
55
56
50
60
60
47
64
71
Percent of Students Proficient or Above on OAA in MATH
6th
7th
8th
2006-07
2007-08
2008-09
2009-10
2010-11
2006-07
2007-08
2008-09
2009-10
2010-11
2006-07
2007-08
2008-09
2009-10
2010-11
Middle
Schools NOT in School Improvement
Miller-South Excellent
93
95
94
87
89
91
87
92
85
87
96
95
93
90
89
NIHF-STEM Excellent
NA
NA
NA
90
87
NA
NA
NA
NA
93
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
Middle
Schools IN School Improvement
Akron Opportunity Center Academic Emergency
NA
NA
NA
17
NA
NA
NA
23
11
18
NA
6
3
6
13
Bridges Continuous Improvement
NA
0
30
14
37
NA
NA
NA
6
NA
NA
NA
0
0
12
Hyre Effective
75
75
73
72
77
80
68
80
69
77
77
73
73
68
76
Innes Academic Watch
46
60
51
47
55
51
36
62
39
50
51
50
40
49
51
Jennings Continuous Improvement
45
55
50
31
49
55
38
53
34
44
59
44
52
38
47
Kent Continuous Improvement
52
54
57
55
56
42
40
50
46
54
48
38
49
55
67
Litchfield Continuous Improvement
62
55
61
74
54
72
43
55
50
64
73
68
61
50
66
Perkins Academic Watch
28
36
48
33
34
42
27
51
36
45
49
49
39
41
37
Percent of Students Proficient or Above
on OGT in READING and MATH
10th Grade READING
10th Grade MATH
2006-07
2007-08
2008-09
2009-10
2010-11
2006-07
2007-08
2008-09
2009-10
2010-11
High
Schools NOT in School Improvement
Akron Early College Excellent
NA
NA
97
99
100
NA
NA
96
97
99
Buchtel Continuous Improvement
78
63
76
65
76
60
51
60
53
64
High
Schools IN School Improvement
Akron Alternative Academy Continuous Improvement
80
76
75
78
86
54
41

64

60
52
East Continuous Improvement
77
63
55
64
67
66
56
70
60
58
Ellet Effective
89
85
82
87
87
81
81
84
82
82
Firestone Effective
93
84
87
88
88
83
77
86
87
82
Garfield Continuous Improvement
80
76
74
70
64
66
66
73
66
65
Kenmore Continuous Improvement
78
73
68
67
81
71
64
64
67
70
North Continuous Improvement
72
66
64
64
65
64
62
68
62
59